I've had a hard time writing about immigration policy. It's not because
I don't have opinions on it (you should all be that lucky) but more because I
see a reasonable policy as a forlorn hope.
That however will not stop me, any more than it stops me on all of my
other Quixotic railing against stupidity and ignorance. Here is, imo, the crux
of the problem for Western countries and the proximate cause of our eventual disappearance.
Don't be ridiculous, you say? That is the logical extension of this
thinking, and it would take a lot less than that to destroy Canada as Canada.
We can help some people, but we need to do that in such a way that they help us
too. The harsh market truth is that a woman in her 60s with no money, no skills
and who doesn't even speak one of our official languages is a liability to
Canada, not an asset.
This is the sort of thinking which keeps the wheels turning and the
lights on; mushy bleeding-heart talk about trampled "rights" in places
we can't control does not help Canada (or the UK, France, Italy, Australia, the
USA, etc. ) retain its' character as a place people would want to live in
preference to their 3rd-World shithole.
You see what happens when I start in on this stuff? Obnoxious but
unassailable truth is what happens. Sure you can tell me I'm a big meanie or a
racist or whatever the fuck else you want to tar me with, but WE CAN'T TAKE
EVERYBODY WHO WANTS TO COME HERE. I wish I could find the link to it again, but
I saw an excellent lecture on immigration which involved jars full of marbles representing
the various populations of the world. It very graphically represented what
would happen if we were to open the borders, and that if we do so we'll all be
living in Nairobi, and most of us not in the nice parts.
"We" are vastly outnumbered, and we should act like it, or
there won't be a "we" left. Be very clear that this isn't some
"White Power" shtick, I'm talking about culture, which can be
adopted. Multiculturalism has failed. It works, for a while, as part of an
empire, but a functioning democracy is a delicate flower which can be crowded
out by weeds. Iffy analogy, but I think you get the point.
Going back to Nigeria again, contrast the governance of that country
with that of Canada. It's a good comparison, as both have rich resource-based
economies and educated, English-speaking ruling classes. Canada has internal
divisions, but not the sort who raid each others' villages; the same cannot be
said for the diverse parties in Nigeria. Nigeria is not poor, and Nigerians are
no stupider on an individual basis than Canadians are (I'll steer clear of
"Race IQ" stuff) so I would have to say the difference between their volatile
and ineffective governance and ours is mostly a cultural one.
Now, if you like the way they do things, good for you. I don't, and I
suspect the majority of people who grew up in (or gravitated to) the Western
system would like to keep living in it. That means we can take some
immigrants from wherever, but in digestible increments, and not just anyone.
Sticking to this sort of policy is not for the meek, but if you like how things
are where you are, it must be done so that the fortunate and productive few who
we do take in have a nice place to live.
No comments:
Post a Comment